Progymnaswhata?

by Dr. Grant Weinberg

Growing up going to school, I had written my share of thesis and research papers. I even passed most of them. When I started at ECS, I didn’t realize how little I knew about papers and even less about the Progymnasmata. Besides being a word that I can’t say quickly, the Progymnasmata is the set of pre exercises for students to do to learn Rhetoric. It stems from the ancient Greeks and flows through the years of education until the end of the 18th century. To say that it had longevity is an understatement. I could give a diatribe on why it went out of fashion, but for now, I would like to explain more of what it is.

First, why do we write? We write because it helps one to organize his thoughts. It also helps one to think logically. These exercises force logical progression of thought onto a person’s writing that is a gift to everyone: reader and writer. It builds vocabulary, grammar, and everything else that schools and colleges care about. The thing that I love most about writing though is that it trains one to communicate in a way that lasts for generations to come. The written word has changed my life, it is how God has chosen to communicate with us, and words have moved every great person in history. If we want to change the world, it always starts with words.

Now, when it comes to the exercises, there is a progression to them that build one to the other. The beginning exercises focus most on taking in information and putting it in the student’s own words. Fable, Narrative, Chreia, and Proverb are all exercises that focus on what was said and the truth and value of the saying. These are meant to focus on what is true and good and still say it beautifully. These exercises are meant for late grammar stage students and early logic stage.

From there, the exercises look to build arguments for what is right and wrong, looking at the ideas and the characters of literature. Refutation and Confirmation are the converses of each other. They both argue about the truth of an event. The Commonplace traditionally looks to amplify and expose a virtue or a vice but historically looks only at the negative vice and why is it wrong. Finally, the Encomium and Vituperation look to individuals, considering their parentage, education, and deeds and if they are great or terrible people. The final composition of this section is the Comparison, which is either a double Encomium or an Encomium and Vituperation. The two people are compared together, going back and forth in order to easily draw comparison between the two people. These exercises are ideal for later Logic and early Rhetoric stage students.

The final group of exercises are about creation and persuasion. It is not enough for people to know how to learn things and if they are true or false. Learning to write should give a person the ability to change people’s minds. It starts with Impersonation, which makes a student analyze the style of another person, jump into their mind, and create something from that mind frame. From there, we jump to Description which is all about being able to take an experience and make someone else feel what you feel. If you have ever felt a shiver run down your spine while reading a book, it was probably from a description that made you actually feel something. My most recent one was from R.C. Sproul’s Holiness of God when he describes himself feeling the Holiness of God while walking into a church. The final two are Thesis and Defend/Attack a Law. While their constructions are slightly different, they are both doing similar things. The Thesis gives an argument of some kind, normally putting multiple ideas together. While the Defend/Attack a Law is political in nature, arguing for specific enactment or redaction of a law or rule. These are the jewels of the Rhetoric stage that gives each person the tools they need to change society.

While Progymnasmata may be difficult to say, the value that these exercises provide an individual is worth the collective weight of all your Omni books in platinum, yet we seek to cram it into six years of Omnibus. It is a progression that if cut short in the beginning is a disservice, or not finished in the end is a travesty. It might seem silly in the moment or like a lot of busy work, but in reality, it is all about shaping a mind to fit with all the geniuses of the past. I hope this helped you see where you are at in your journey with a glimpse at the end. We hope to build something out of each of you. These exercises are the nails and boards of the structure. We need a few hundred of them to build anything of consequence.

ECS Is a Bootcamp


Of course they want us dead.

Bootcamps exist because enemies are real.

ECS is a bootcamp.

This is a potentially more controversial letter (and longer!) than I typically write in this space, but I think it’s fitting in the current cultural moment.

The celebration of the assassination of Charlie Kirk on the part of many on the political left has been very revealing.  Of course, not all were guilty of this detestable celebration, but that there were any at all is illuminating.  What sort of person would find such a murder to be a cause of celebration?  What sort of a person poses such a threat that the enemies of God celebrate when he’s sniped by a coward? The obvious reality is that there still are actual people in the world who delight in the high-visibility murder of a godly man…just as in Jesus’ day.  

This is not an encomium of Charlie Kirk, though that would not be inappropriate. Rather, it’s a statement of another obvious reality: In a host of ways, ECS is working to produce people like Charlie Kirk. What sorts of people do I mean?

We need people who acknowledge their own shortcomings, repent of their sins, and embrace the free grace of God and identity in Christ.  Such people are unfazed by their enemies’ attempts to discredit them on the grounds of past sins for which they’ve been forgiven.

We need people who will fight. For too long Christians have been listening to the world tell us that being loving means not fighting.  We let the world set the terms of engagement.  We stand by when they tell us how Christians are allowed to behave as they work to discredit us.  Acknowledging that we don’t need their help (that is, we’re doing a perfectly good job discrediting ourselves without their assistance), the narrative is still potent: Anyone who won’t turn the other cheek to all manner of blasphemy and slander and violence is unloving and shouldn’t call himself a Christian.  This, of course, is hogwash.    

Our Christian culture is anemic; it’s weak, lacking the blood-iron of conviction, and so it comes as little surprise when we start to talk like them.  How many times were we told during COVID how Jesus would have us to act?  And how many of those lessons came from the world?  We were ill prepared to engage on intellectual, biblical, and convictional grounds.

Alas. We must fight.  It’s been said that grace has a backbone; we need to practice a godly disagreeability.  And we should not suppose that we’re going to get out of here unscathed, whether we choose to fight or not.  For some, this means staying the course where you are; for others, it means engaging in ways that you’ve been reticent to do in the past.  

The fighting we’re engaged in at ECS is deceptive because it involves cute little kids. Nevertheless, the kingdom of darkness suffers violence when our first graders recite the Apostles’ Creed.  Satan, Beelzebub, Moloch, Ashtoreth, Baal, and Osiris recoil when we sing “Blessed the Man that Fears Jehovah” at Matins.  Why? Because they’re threatened and offended at the notion of generations of the godly enjoying sweet fellowship.

We also need people who fight graciously. Love powers and directs our fighting.  It is a love for the truth, a love for the innocent, a love for the marginalized, and a love for the defenseless that energizes and orients us.  A compassion for people who are destroying themselves (like the victims of self-mutilation nicknamed “gender realignment”) requires that we share with them that identity is something given by God, not by self.  

Our love for people of every skin color comes from the realization that man’s real and infinite value comes from the fact that he bears God’s image.  The very thing that gives men value is actually common to all men; therefore, no one human is inherently better or more valuable than any other.  Though some cultures produce people who bear God’s image more accurately or potently, it’s not as though they’re inherently superior.  Because we embrace an objective standard outside of ourselves, we don’t have to carry the burden of those who try to find meaning, identity, and reality in themselves.  

We need people who fight fair. Christians tend to opt for softness while our enemies fight dirty.  They lie, we speak the truth.  They weaponize Scripture by twisting it; we weaponize Scripture by unleashing it.  Charlie Kirk was tender but not soft.  We must always wield the truth with love, but the truth often hurts when it hits its mark. Our enemies will call this “unchristian” or “hypocritical.”  We must stand firm, and be ready to to repent when we fail.

I could go on, but the point is this: at ECS we are trying to raise up exactly the sort of people who pose such a threat to the enemies of God that they must be dealt with.  Very few will engage in such a public context as Kirk, but many will be as threatening to our enemies in their different spheres of influence.  

While the celebratory response was surprising, it should not have been.  Intellectually, we know that God’s enemies are our enemies, and though we are to love them, they want us dead.  Still, when the intellectual reality takes on three dimensions and we see it, we are reminded that Christians are at war.  

Since that is the case, training is pretty important! Your kids cannot escape the war; they can be well-trained to fight in it.  And it’ll involve far more books and math facts and psalms than it will guns and knives and fists.  

Risus est bellum.
Jonathan